Brainspotting vs EMDR: What’s the Difference?

EMDR and Brainspotting are both therapies that use eye position to work with distressing memories, but the resemblance is mostly surface-level. EMDR follows a standardized eight-phase protocol built around rhythmic bilateral stimulation. Brainspotting has you hold a single, fixed eye position and follows a looser, less structured process. EMDR also has far more research behind it.

If you’ve heard both names used almost interchangeably, you’re not alone. Therapists sometimes train in both, and clients often can’t tell you which one they did. That mix-up makes sense, since both ask you to hold a difficult memory in mind while doing something specific with your eyes. But one is a decades-old, guideline-recommended therapy, and the other is a younger approach still building its evidence base. Here’s what each one actually involves, what the research shows so far, and how to think about the gap between them.

What is Brainspotting?

Brainspotting was developed in 2003 by David Grand, a psychotherapist who had trained in EMDR a decade earlier. Per Brainspotting’s own account of its origin, Grand noticed the technique almost by accident during a session with a competitive figure skater who’d long been blocked on a triple loop, a block with a dissociative quality to it. He was guiding her through EMDR-style eye movements as she pictured the jump in slow motion when her eyes wobbled and froze at one point in her visual field; holding her gaze there, rather than continuing to sweep it back and forth, seemed to shake something loose. She landed the jump for the first time the next day.

From that moment, Grand built a theory: specific eye positions, or “Brainspots,” connect to where the brain holds an unprocessed, distressing experience. In a session, the therapist slowly moves a pointer across your visual field, watching for reflexive cues, such as a flinch, a change in breathing, or a catch in your eyes, that mark a spot. Some therapists instead ask you to notice where activation shows up in your own body as the pointer moves. Either way, you then hold your gaze at that spot while noticing whatever sensations, images, or emotions surface, with the therapist mostly observing rather than directing.

There’s no fixed phase sequence the way EMDR has one. Sessions typically run 60 to 90 minutes, and a single memory might ease over two to eight sessions, though some therapists also offer longer, multi-hour “intensives.” Becoming a certified Brainspotting practitioner requires completing Phase 1 and Phase 2 trainings, plus at least one advanced training, documenting 50 sessions, and logging six hours of consultation, all on top of an existing therapy license.

What is EMDR?

EMDR, or Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, was developed by psychologist Dr. Francine Shapiro in 1987. Its theory, the Adaptive Information Processing model, holds that distress often comes from memories stored in a raw, unprocessed form. Process the memory, the theory goes, and the distress attached to it eases too.

In a session, you briefly hold a distressing memory in mind while your eyes track a therapist’s moving fingers, or you follow alternating tones or taps, in short sets of bilateral stimulation. Unlike Brainspotting’s single fixed point, EMDR’s stimulation keeps moving back and forth throughout each set, pausing periodically so the therapist can check in. The process follows a standardized eight-phase protocol: history-taking and preparation happen once, then assessment, desensitization, installation, body scan, closure, and reevaluation repeat for each new memory worked through.

That structure is a big part of why EMDR has been easier to study, and to teach consistently across therapists. It’s also why becoming an EMDR clinician requires an EMDRIA-approved basic training built around that specific eight-phase sequence, on top of a clinical license.

EMDR vs Brainspotting at a glance

EMDR Brainspotting
Developed 1987, by psychologist Dr. Francine Shapiro 2003, by psychotherapist David Grand
Core theory Adaptive Information Processing: distress comes from unprocessed memory Fixed eye positions (“Brainspots”) connect to where distress is held in the brain
What you do in session Briefly recall a memory while your eyes track a moving stimulus, or follow alternating tones or taps Hold a single eye position while noticing sensations and emotions that surface
Structure Standardized eight-phase protocol No fixed phase sequence; the therapist follows what emerges
Session length 60–90 minutes (EMDRIA) Typically 60–90 minutes; some therapists offer multi-hour intensives
Practitioner training EMDRIA-approved basic training Phase 1 and 2 trainings plus certification (50 documented sessions, 6 hours consultation)
PTSD guideline status Recommended (WHO 2013; VA/DoD 2023); conditionally recommended (APA 2017) Not currently named in APA, VA/DoD, or WHO guidelines
Research base Decades of trials, including large meta-analyses A handful of small pilot and comparative studies, including one co-authored by its founder

How do the sessions feel different?

On paper, the two look similar: you recall something painful while your eyes do something specific, guided by a professional who doesn’t need every detail narrated aloud. In the room, the pace diverges.

EMDR has rhythm to it. Bilateral stimulation runs in short, repeated sets, your eyes, ears, or hands moving back and forth, pausing every 20 to 30 seconds so the therapist can ask what’s surfacing. That regular check-in gives EMDR a structured, almost metronomic quality, with a clear sense of where you are in the process.

Brainspotting feels slower and more still. Once the therapist locates your spot, your eyes stay fixed there, sometimes for several minutes at a stretch, while you notice whatever comes up in your body or your thoughts. There’s less verbal back-and-forth throughout. People who find EMDR’s constant motion activating sometimes describe Brainspotting as calmer to sit inside, though that’s a personal impression rather than a measured finding.

Neither approach asks you to describe the memory in detail before starting, which sets both apart from most talk therapy.

What does the research say?

This is where the two pull apart the most, and it’s worth being direct about it.

EMDR has been studied for decades. The World Health Organization’s 2013 guideline and the 2023 VA/DoD clinical practice guideline both recommend EMDR for PTSD, and the APA’s 2017 guideline conditionally recommends it. Its evidence includes large randomized trials and meta-analyses, which is why it can be compared with confidence against other therapies. For a deeper look, see what the research actually says about EMDR.

Brainspotting’s evidence is much thinner. The main comparative study, published in the Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology in 2017, gave 76 trauma survivors three 60-minute sessions of either EMDR or Brainspotting. Both groups showed significant drops in PTSD symptoms, with no statistically significant difference between them. It’s a genuinely useful early signal. But the study wasn’t randomized and the sample was small. One of its three authors is David Grand, Brainspotting’s founder, a conflict of interest worth knowing about.

A smaller 2022 study in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health took a different approach. It put 40 participants, mostly psychologists and physicians rather than a general patient sample, through a single 40-minute session of EMDR, Brainspotting, body scan meditation, and reading, each applied to a different distressing personal memory. Distress ratings dropped significantly right after the session for EMDR, Brainspotting, and body scan meditation; the reading control condition showed a smaller effect. EMDR and Brainspotting also outperformed the other two right after the session and again at follow-up.

Beyond these small studies, no major clinical guideline currently names Brainspotting as a recommended PTSD treatment. Its proposed mechanism, that specific eye positions give direct access to where the brain stores distress, has also drawn open criticism. Neurologist Steven Novella called it “classic pseudoscience” in 2025, arguing the specific brain-based claims behind “Brainspots” haven’t been demonstrated. A similar critique ran in Psychology Today the same year.

None of this means Brainspotting does nothing for the people who try it. Something is happening in these sessions, whether it’s the specific mechanism Grand proposes, the general power of focused attention and a caring therapist, or some mix of both. It does mean the evidence gap between the two approaches is real, and worth knowing before you invest time or money in either.

Which one fits you?

EMDR may fit better if:

  • You want a therapy backed by major PTSD guidelines and decades of trials.
  • You’re comfortable with a structured protocol and regular check-ins along the way.
  • You’d rather choose the option with the deeper evidence base, including research beyond PTSD.

Brainspotting may fit better if:

  • You’ve tried EMDR’s constant back-and-forth motion and found it too activating or distracting.
  • You respond well to slower, quieter, more body-focused processing.
  • A Brainspotting-trained therapist is genuinely more available to you than an EMDR one, and you understand you’re choosing a less-studied option.

Because Grand trained in EMDR before developing Brainspotting, many Brainspotting practitioners are also EMDR-trained, and some blend elements of both. If you’re talking with a therapist who offers either, it’s fair to ask directly what the evidence shows for your specific concern, and how they’ll adjust course if it isn’t helping. For how EMDR compares to a completely different kind of therapy, see our comparison of EMDR and CBT.

Whichever you’re drawn to, the same caution applies to both: processing significant trauma, especially anything involving abuse, combat, or repeated dissociation, is safest with a licensed professional who can pace the work carefully. The choice of modality matters less than making sure whoever you work with is trained, licensed, and genuinely a good fit for you.

Can you practice either one on your own?

Here the two diverge sharply.

Some Brainspotting therapists teach a simplified version, sometimes called self-brainspotting or gazespotting, using a pen, a candle, or your own finger as a pointer. It’s generally described as appropriate only for mildly distressing material, not significant trauma. It’s also typically taught by a therapist first rather than picked up cold.

EMDR’s core ingredient, bilateral stimulation, translates more naturally to solo practice, because the technique itself, alternating left-right attention, doesn’t depend on a therapist locating a precise spot for you. You can try it yourself: hold a mildly stressful moment in mind while tapping your knees in a slow left-right rhythm, and notice whether it softens. Our beginner’s guide to self-guided bilateral stimulation walks through it in more depth.

EmEase, a self-guided EMDR app, is the guided version of this technique: visual and audio bilateral stimulation with adjustable pacing at app.emease.com. It’s a wellness practice inspired by EMDR therapy, not Brainspotting, and not a replacement for either therapy in this comparison. For anything beyond everyday stress, a licensed EMDR or Brainspotting therapist is the safer route.

The bottom line

EMDR and Brainspotting both ask you to hold a memory in mind while doing something specific with your eyes, and both have real people reporting real relief. But they’re not equally proven. EMDR carries decades of trials and a place in major treatment guidelines. Brainspotting carries a handful of small studies, genuine early promise, and open scientific skepticism about the theory behind it.

That gap doesn’t mean Brainspotting is worthless, or that everyone should default to EMDR. It means going in with clear eyes about what’s established and what’s still being tested, and asking any therapist or ad making confident claims what those claims are actually based on.

For everyday stress rather than deep trauma work, bilateral stimulation, EMDR’s core technique, is the piece you can safely start practicing on your own today.

Frequently asked questions

Is Brainspotting or EMDR more effective for trauma?

The main comparative trial, a 2017 study of 76 trauma survivors, found three sessions of Brainspotting reduced PTSD symptoms about as much as three sessions of EMDR, with no significant difference between groups. But EMDR has decades more research behind it and is named in major PTSD treatment guidelines; Brainspotting currently isn't.

Is Brainspotting evidence-based like EMDR?

Not to the same degree. EMDR is recommended in major PTSD guidelines from the WHO, VA/DoD, and APA. Brainspotting has a handful of small pilot studies, including one co-authored by its founder, and isn't named in any of those guidelines. Some science writers have called its eye-position mechanism scientifically unproven.

Can you do Brainspotting on yourself?

A limited version, yes. Some Brainspotting therapists teach clients to hold their own gaze on a fixed point using a pointer, for mildly distressing material only. Deeper trauma work is meant to happen with a trained Brainspotting therapist present.

How long does Brainspotting take to work?

Sessions typically run 60 to 90 minutes, and a single distressing memory may ease over as few as two to eight sessions, similar to EMDR's usual pace. Some therapists also offer multi-hour Brainspotting intensives. As with EMDR, timelines vary by person and by how complex the material is.

Do EMDR and Brainspotting use the same theory?

No. EMDR's Adaptive Information Processing model holds that bilateral stimulation helps the brain reprocess a stuck memory. Brainspotting's theory holds that certain eye positions connect directly to where distress is stored in deeper brain regions. The two share an eye-based, memory-focused approach, but the theories themselves differ a lot.

Sources